MILWAUKEE — The Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors on Thursday, June 25th moved to override a veto issued by Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele. Abele vetoed a measure by the County Board to authorize the Department of Administrative Services to transfer $1.5 million to the Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office to allow for the hiring of 30 deputy-trainees, and to cover the Sheriff’s Office’s current projected budget deficit.
In a 17-1 vote, the County Board on Thursday approved granting further funding to the Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office. A class of 30 deputy-trainees is scheduled to begin in July and successful trainees will join deputy ranks in early 2016.
“Preserving the safety and security of its citizens should be the number one priority of our government. We can debate spending levels all day and all night for food trucks and living wages, but we must focus on adequately staffing our Sheriff’s Office and ensuring the deputies putting their own safety on the line for ours can make headway toward a reasonable balance between duty and relief,” Milwaukee County Supervisor Deanna Alexander said in a statement to FOX6 News.
The Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office issued this statement to FOX6 News on this veto override:
“Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke stated that (Thursday’s) override of County Executive Abele’s veto that provides $1.5 million to hire 30 additional deputies emphasizes the important role played by County Board Chairwoman Marina Dimitrijevic and her fellow supervisors regarding public safety in Milwaukee county.
The original resolution passed 16-2, and the override veto passed 17-1. Abele knew his veto would not sustain an override; the veto was nothing more than his continued personal vendetta against the Sheriff.
Sheriff Clarke indicates that he’s facing severe staffing shortages in all areas of his responsibility. This is causing delayed responses on the freeway and for calls for service. The critical shortage delays the service of domestic abuse injunctions and other orders, and impacts services to the circuit courts, jail operations and investigative functions. It also curtails participation in community functions that strengthen the relationship between the sheriff’s office and the public.
Abele spent $263,000 of his personal wealth to try to defeat the Sheriff last fall. Abele continues to frustrate the will of the voters who elected Clarke to make public safety decisions.”
Abele said he vetoed the plan because he’s looking out for Milwaukee County’s long-term financial health. In issuing his veto, Abele issued this statement in a memo to the County Board:
Abele spent $263,000 of his personal wealth to try to defeat the Sheriff last fall. Abele continues to frustrate the will of the voters who elected Clarke to make public safety decisions.
“I have always been committed to maintaining public safety in Milwaukee. Together, we created the Office Emergency Management, bolstered programming at the House of Correction, funded Universal Screening and other programs through the Courts, and strengthened the District Attorney’s Office.
At the same time, Milwaukee County’s fiscal outlook has significantly improved in the last four years. Thanks to many tough decisions that we have made, we have been able to maintain services while reducing our structural deficit. We’ve done this by providing services differently, reducing the County’s footprint, increasing operating efficiency, increasing benefit cost sharing, building reserves, and utilizing one-time revenues properly. That’s the good news. The bad news is that, despite the significant improvements made over the past few years, Milwaukee County still faces a long-term fiscal imbalance. The Office of the Comptroller has estimated that over the five-year period from 2015 to 2019, the annual structural deficit will increase from $32 million in 2015 to $94 million if no sustainable, long-term decisions are made to the County’s current operations.
It is in this context that we have to analyze all funding decisions, including funding decisions related to the Sheriff’s Office. In its 2015 budget request, the Sheriff’s Office asked for a 42.5% increase to its budget, an amount that exceeded $28 million dollars, along with 181 additional FTE positions. When the final budget ultimately provided his Office with a more realistic increase, the Sheriff filed suit against the County Executive and County Board, requesting “an order declaring that the County Board of Supervisors and the County Executive’s 2015 budget is arbitrary and unreasonable.”
Recognizing both the importance of public safety and the need for basic responsibility in budgeting, I proposed a major increase of $3.9 million in tax levy support to the Sheriff’s Office in 2015. The County funds the Sheriff’s Office with a lump sum payment that the Sheriff then has autonomy over, which he can use to support mandated service areas while focusing the Department on its core mission of serving a fully-incorporated county. The $3.9 million dollar increase I proposed was one of the single biggest increases in 2015 to any department, division or office countywide.
The County Board ultimately approved an increase to the Sheriff Office’s spending budget of over $6 million dollars. However, they did so using budget gimmicks and unrealistic revenue projections. Their budget did not provide full funding for added positions. Eleven command staff positions went unfunded. Additionally, the Board added $500,000 in “anticipated” revenue that even a Sheriff’s Office variance report indicated would not be available in 2015.
Currently, the Sheriff’s Office is projecting a deficit of approximately $900,000. According to an April 28 memo written by Corporation Counsel, the salary impact of the Board’s decision to leave the 11 command staff positions unfunded is comparable to the size of the Sheriff Office’s deficit. At the time the Board made these decisions, I said that the County was setting itself up for another deficit in the Sheriff’s Office. Unfortunately, that prediction proved accurate.
State law determines that contingency funds can be transferred to address unforeseen conditions and public emergencies. The present case is neither. Management decisions and budget gimmicks conspired to create an entirely predictable deficit in the Sheriff’s Office. Although the Sheriff is solely responsible for determining how to best structure and manage his Office, the taxpayers of Milwaukee County expect responsible fiscal management and balanced budgets. The Sheriff ran a $6 million dollar deficit in 2014. He’s running a deficit again. I respect the Sheriff’s autonomy over his operations, but I would not be doing my job if I stood by and watched repeated deficits occur under his watch.
The Sheriff’s Office has had turnover in its ranks and has unfilled positions that a new class of Deputies could fill. As I have said previously, we can fund the hiring of new Deputies when the need arises so long as the County’s finances are protected by having a balanced budget out of the Sheriff’s Office. I do not support the use of budget tricks and one-time contingency funds to pay for what will be a regular expense starting in 2016. This resolution will increase what is already projected to be a significant structural deficit in the 2016 budget, and it will be important to address this when that budget is taken up.”
Sheriff Clarke argued that Abele is playing politics with public safety — saying staffing levels within the Sheriff’s Office are dangerously low. Sheriff Clarke responded to Abele’s veto in a statement issued to FOX6 News. That statement reads:
“My office worked with the Milwaukee County Board to fix a hole in the budget left by County Executive Abele, and to secure additional money to hire 30 new sheriff’s deputies, after the county executive’s proposal for 2015 was to lay off key command staff members and additional deputies. No new deputies have been hired since 2004, leaving my staffing levels at dangerously low totals. Ironically, today I received a letter from a Milwaukee County circuit court judge who complained that a staffing shortage is having an impact on court security. I concur with the judge’s concerns, however, I don’t have enough people. I made this clear in my budget requests in both 2013 and 2014, only to have the county executive in his budget submission continue to lay off staff.
This resolution passed the county board 16-2, well over the level to survive a budget veto. Abele’s petulance, however, blinded him to that fact. This is nothing more than Abele’s continued vindictive relationship with my office. He has had this personal vendetta ever since spending $263,000 of his personal wealth to try to defeat me in the 2014 sheriff’s election. When asked about it by the media he feigned any knowledge, and when he could no longer continue with the denial he finally admitted it. The voters made it very clear as to who should make their public safety decisions. Abele played his card thinking we spend too much on public safety, and he was soundly defeated. Chris Abele is a man who is not used to being rejected or not getting his way.
Recently he made a request to take $100,000 from my budget to put toward his hiring of Hollywood-level private security for himself. This is his nature. He wants county taxpayers to pay for his private security and they can just “eat cake.” Since he became county executive he has shown nothing but disdain for law enforcement officers. This is the same guy who was arrested for drunk driving and ignored the citation for seven years, allowing it to turn into a warrant.
Abele continues to peddle the lie that he increased our budget by $4 million. That has been debunked with proof based on budget records. I will work with the County Board to ensure the veto is overridden so that the people of Milwaukee County, including the courts, get the public safety services they deserve.”